davidgillon: Text: I really don't think you should put your hand inside the manticore, you don't know where it's been. (Don't put your hand inside the manticore)

Twice in five minutes twitter has had me not just *facepalm*ing, but full-on head-in-hands over abled attitudes to disability access.

First up were a bunch of pedestrianisation/sustainable transportation advocates arguing public transport meant no one needed cars. Someone had already made a point about public transport not meeting their needs that was probably disability related, so I pointed out mass transport fails as an access solution for disabled people because it doesn't address the mobility barriers between stop and destination. Not the built environment, but the physical environment of how far is it and how steep is the slope that determine accessibility if you have very limited ambulant mobility or are a wheelchair user. Not only did I get a general denial that it's an issue, but I had someone arguing that the solution to disability access was e-scooters (I really, really, really wish I was kidding).

And I just read the twitter profile of the main guy (not e-scooter guy), and he's not some random green, he's a senior transportation specialist at the World Bank. FFS!

Then I noticed a thread about the latest edition of the 'D&D Combat Wheelchair' rules. Yes, it's a thing, there are even figures available, and it's a thing that an ungodly number of ableds seem to find threatening in some way. So threatening that someone has actually spent several hours drawing an annoyingly well illustrated cartoon with character 1, in wooden wheelchair saying "Thank god, an accessible dungeon", and character 2 promptly magicking them them into an abled. So the first post in the thread was "Hey, new version is now out," and the second was the cartoon. After which it degenerated into D&D nerds who don't get the point saying but what about Spell X, and people who don't just get the point but know rather more about disability and why the D&D spells are a very limited solution. But seriously, what kind of a abled arsehole posts that cartoon as an immediate response?

Aargh, Ableds*


* Obviously not all ableds, but far too many of them.

davidgillon: A pair of crutches, hanging from coat hooks, reflected in a mirror (Default)

About three months ago, there was a story in the Guardian about a bunch of climate activists letting the air out of the tires of every SUV parked in a posh area of London, with an interview with them where they claimed that no one needed something the size of a SUV.

Now I thought that it was a particularly stupid idea in the first place, being more likely to irritate people than attract them to pro-climate policies, but it also seemed to have the potential to cause issues for disabled people. So I tweeted about it, noting that if you're mobility impaired then the height of a SUV can make getting in and out more practical, and if you're a wheelchair user then the extra space of the SUV bodyform is really useful, so there's a pretty good chance you're hitting disabled people, not the wealthy. (I actually was thinking more of the mid-range SUVs than your typical Range Rover, there, but the point applies from mini-SUVs on up).

And got a response from a cycling activist saying "How can we tell the difference?"

*Headdesk*

So I answered you can't, which is only the truth (but I would probably have said that even if it wasn't, like I said, it's a stupid idea we don't want to encourage).

Then nothing for two or three months, only for a new message today from (looking at his Twitter profile) another cycling evangelist.

"With respect David, no one needs a supersize SUV. We have a VW Touran which we choose, having kids, due to its very large boot capacity. It’s a 2 litre, 7 seater. So please explain why anyone needs a 5l ranger rover?"

(I was particularly amused at the cycling activist claiming he's a better person because he only drives a 2l seven seater VW Touran. I'm sorry, you're preaching everyone should do everything by bike while riding around in a 2L Touran? Can we have some consistency please?)

Hmm, not a mention of my points about access and mobility needs, and the reductio ad absurdum strawman of the 5L Range Rover. Somehow I don't think you really meant any respect whatsoever, and I'm really not sure you actually read my points, or gave them  any value if you did. Well, if you're going to be like that I'll tailor my response to fit:

"If you meant respect, you probably wouldn't throw out the reductio aa absurdum strawman of a 5l Range Rover. Let's go for something more reasonable: say a 1.5L Yaris Cross, which is a compact SUV, also available as a hybrid. 1/2
 

I'm also wondering whether you actually read my points, because as the driver of a classic Yaris, it's rather too small for me to comfortably use as a single wheelchair user. With my chair in the boot, it's reduced to a 2 seater, awkward for giving a couple of friends a lift. 2/3

 

I can only get into it comfortably because I can just squeeze falling straight back into the driver's seat (and tall I'm not) which doesn't work in, say, my sister's Fiesta. Getting out is awkward. 3/4

But your typical compact SUV with its larger bodywork might well solve all my issues - larger bootspace, no need to drop seats, higher mounted body makes it easier to get into and out of. 4/5"

(Actually, looking again the Yaris Cross might well be no better than my Yaris wrt space, though the extra height would help, probably need to go up to the mid-size SUVs to fit the chair)

 

"But that's just me , one person family, small manual chair. Now add a partner and a couple of kids, and up that to a powerchair and the hoist that goes with it. Or in some cases powerchair and manual chair, or powerchair and scooter, because mobility needs can vary. 5/6

So by the time we're up to typical family size we've left the compact SUVs behind and you're going to be looking at that Touran and thinking "wish we had a bit more space". 6/7

 

And let's be clear, no Touran is a seven seater if you're carrying a wheelchair. Checking dimensions, you might even need to collapse the second row just for my small chair and certainly will for some powerchairs and scooters. 7/8

The size of a Range Rover suddenly doesn't look so excessive, particularly if you have two or three hulking teens and the family dog to shuttle around. Whether you need the 5L engine is another matter, but I'm arguing size, not power. 8/9

 

And all that's assuming you can transfer from your chair, if you need to drive from it, then all bets are off WRT the bodysize you need.

TLDR: Wheelchairs take more space than people think, the SUV form-factor works well for people with mobility impairments. 9/9"

And as a later addendum:

"(Having checked, the RVAR Reference Wheelchair Size is 1200mm x 700mm, so even a manual chair can potentially reduce your Touran to a 2 seater)"

*Sigh* The moral of this story is that saying "With respect", when you clearly don't mean it, is a good way to annoy me.

 
davidgillon: A pair of crutches, hanging from coat hooks, reflected in a mirror (Default)

So an environmentalist group called Replanet has decided the Ukraine war is the perfect opportunity for advancing their agenda (I have some doubts about their ethics here) and has put out a report advocating #SwitchOffPutin (or #switchoffputin as they had it because they're completely unaware Camel Case is better for accessibility*).

Their plan calls for cutting European dependence on Russian fuel immediately by banning intra-European flights**, switching on all the mothballed nuke plants, limiting all households to a fixed amount of gas usage, and banning cars from city centres.

You can probably imagined I immediately spotted a problem with the last two from the disability standpoint. For the first one with disabled people in general having higher energy usage, especially in Northern European countries, and with some disabled people being absolutely dependent on having their house at a fixed temperature because they can't thermoregulate, and for the second one because it assumes public transport is 1) accessible and 2) can get you close enough to your destination, which is optimistic even in the most access-friendly European cities because for some disabled people close enough to your destination is going to be within 100m, while if it's up a hill and you can't park outside, forget it.

So I tweeted, and I got a response, which was basically "Whoops, good point. This is an emergency, we hoped governments would regulate and make exceptions, just like with Covid***"

Me: So why doesn't your report say that? It would only need a sentence. You forgot about us didn't you?

Them: You're very passionate, why not join us as a volunteer and make sure our next report has a clue about disability

Me: Bugger off, I'm not doing your accessibility audits for free.

* I admit I needed reminding, I tend to do Camel Case more often than not, but do forget when I'm annoyed

** You can tell here that it's an environmental agenda rather than an anti-Putin agenda because it took me 30 seconds to confirm from multiple sources that European AvGas consumption is mainly fueled from the Middle East and India.

*** Another disabled person hopped in on that, pointing out the Covid regs often threw disabled people to the wolves, or were deliberately mis-used to limit access (they're from York, which used the Covid regs to ban disabled parking in the city centre).

 

Profile

davidgillon: A pair of crutches, hanging from coat hooks, reflected in a mirror (Default)
David Gillon

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 18192021 22
2324 2526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 06:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios