Inconsistent Much
Mar. 30th, 2020 09:37 pmMy sister rang earlier, her headmistress had been in touch to say "Your 14 days self-isolation are up, are you coming back in?" and she wanted me to check over the list of official resources she was going to quote her, all saying "Are you for real?"
Bear in mind that she was primarily self-isolating because her husband is extremely high risk, and she is waiting for clarification from her GP as to whether she is high risk herself.
And that a fortnight ago her head told her : "If you'd come in, I'd have sent you home."
{Rolls Eyes}
In local news, I managed to finish my sensitivity read and send off the mark-ups and comments. So that's done and I've given myself the day off to play games on the computer - in practise this means I sit in front of the computer intending to play games and get stuck reading the Guardian's Coronavirus live feed for hours.
For variation I spent a couple of hours poking into the complete and utter fuck-up that NICE* made of the Coronavirus Critical Care guidelines, the first version of which basically said that any disabled person needing support wouldn't get critical care. That included such people are perfectly fit teens and young adults who happen to need carers due to autism or learning disabilities, and adults with physical disabilities that don't affect their general health. One of the MH charities threatened them with an urgent judicial review and NICE discovered, totally coincidentally, that the Clinical Frailty Score isn't medically fit-for-purpose to be used for non-elderly people and they would have to change the guidelines. The NICE comms team's tweet of "We know how you feel" was met with roaring derision by the people who had actually been threatened with being excluded from treatment. The media strategy of four tweets defending their decision, and then a fifth admitting it was clinically indefensible was probably somewhat misguided.
* NICE = the National Institute for Clinical Excellence, which sets treatment standards in the UK.