How Not to Run a Disability Campaign
May. 26th, 2015 07:35 pmTEDx Sydney have responded to the furore over Stella's Challenge (see here) by saying that clearly it's too soon to use Stella's name, so they'll be relaunching the campaign with a new name.
Colour me unimpressed. The issue wasn't the use of her name, but the use of her name for a campaign which went against everything she ever stood for. It's unclear from this whether they have a clue what the issue is, and whether the relaunched campaign will have addressed the problem or not.
And just to illustrate the issues with the campaign, there's an interview on the main TED site with the people responsible (I've linked to the longer version at TEDx Sydney) about the work that went into creating Stella's Challenge, they manage to talk about the concept, research, and implementation of a major disability campaign without ever mentioning disabled people (or people with disabilities), the closest they get is talking about 'those who have had a personal connection to disability' (how, um, precious). One of the Australian activists commenting says the problem is that they only talked to organisations run for disabled people, not by disabled people, I'm not familiar enough with the Australian disability community to know if they're being literal or figurative, but it's pretty damned clear TEDx Sydney managed to launch a major disability campaign focused around a concept any disabled activist could have told them was so utterly dire it would make things worse, not better, so I'm tending towards literal. It's clear none of the people involved knew the first thing about disability, or, and this is the real tragedy, listened to one damn thing Stella said in her TEDx talk.
Colour me unimpressed. The issue wasn't the use of her name, but the use of her name for a campaign which went against everything she ever stood for. It's unclear from this whether they have a clue what the issue is, and whether the relaunched campaign will have addressed the problem or not.
And just to illustrate the issues with the campaign, there's an interview on the main TED site with the people responsible (I've linked to the longer version at TEDx Sydney) about the work that went into creating Stella's Challenge, they manage to talk about the concept, research, and implementation of a major disability campaign without ever mentioning disabled people (or people with disabilities), the closest they get is talking about 'those who have had a personal connection to disability' (how, um, precious). One of the Australian activists commenting says the problem is that they only talked to organisations run for disabled people, not by disabled people, I'm not familiar enough with the Australian disability community to know if they're being literal or figurative, but it's pretty damned clear TEDx Sydney managed to launch a major disability campaign focused around a concept any disabled activist could have told them was so utterly dire it would make things worse, not better, so I'm tending towards literal. It's clear none of the people involved knew the first thing about disability, or, and this is the real tragedy, listened to one damn thing Stella said in her TEDx talk.