davidgillon: Text: I really don't think you should put your hand inside the manticore, you don't know where it's been. (Don't put your hand inside the manticore)
David Gillon ([personal profile] davidgillon) wrote2016-11-24 08:08 pm

Disability Confident Gets Even More Farcical

Sigh, even the DWP admitted that Two Ticks was being abused and needed to be replaced because employers were overwhelmingly not following through on their commitments towards disabled people under the scheme. (Research showed one in five did nothing, and over half met only one of five commitments)

So it created Disability Confident as a (badly flawed) replacement

Then what does it do?

It hands Disability Confident status to every company that had Two Ticks

Utterly farcical

Article with comments by Yours Truly

At least it explains where DWP found 2400 firms to sign up to Disability Confident so quickly. 2300 of them didn't.

hilarita: stoat hiding under a log (Default)

[personal profile] hilarita 2016-11-24 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a fucking farce.
jesse_the_k: Happy & sad monster dolls over "bipolar = 2X Fun" (Bipolar = Twice the Fun)

[personal profile] jesse_the_k 2016-11-24 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
It's ...

I'm afraid political discourse still eludes me, but I share your frustration.
liv: cast iron sign showing etiolated couple drinking tea together (argument)

[personal profile] liv 2016-11-25 08:09 am (UTC)(link)
That really is infurianting. I used to be well-disposed towards employers that had the Two Ticks because although it doesn't affect me directly, I had a strong preference for working for orgs that do value disabled employees. So I feel a fool for thinking that companies actually had to do something to get the badge, rather than saying they would and then not doing anything.
untonuggan: Lily and Chance squished in a cat pile-up on top of a cat tree (buff tabby, black cat with red collar) (Default)

[personal profile] untonuggan 2016-11-27 07:35 pm (UTC)(link)
it's positively Orwellian