Academic writing guide?

[davidgillon]

Does anyone have any recommendations for a guide on how to academic writing?

My sister, as her school's SENCO*, has to do a masters level Postgraduate Certificate in SEND*  (it's a legal requirement of the job), but the guidance she's had is pretty poor, roughly "Academic writing is very different, don't use first or second person and reference everything". Sadly I'm not exaggerating how skimpy it is - I read through it on Sunday morning in under 10 minutes, though it takes a couple of pages to say what I've reduced to a sentence. (I suspect they just haven't taken account of how unsupported people are when everything's being done remotely - three online days to date - and they haven't done academic work in several decades).

Obviously a slightly more useful guide might help her get a better idea of what's expected of her. So is there anything out there? It doesn't have to be subject specific, just cover academic writing in a more useful format.

* Special Educational Needs Coordinator

** Special Educational Needs and Development

 

Comments

[green_knight]

Speaking with academic copyeditor hat on:
- definitely follow the institution's referencing guidelines. (Make your own cheat sheet. It'll save countless hours.] Almost everywhere has its own little quirks about how to employ commas and full stops and italics, the institution or the supervisor have the last word.
- most places have depositories for dissertations; read a couple that have been successfully defended at the institute (extra point if supervised by her supervisor).
- also read the supervisor's own writing, and some of the articles they've cited, to get a feel for what's normal in the field. How chatty or formal or lengthy are other writers?
- Depending on the field, first person may be ok, but 'reference everything' really means 'reference EVERYTHING'
Despite voices to the contrary (Smith, 1990, Jones, 2016), there is a general consensus that the sky is blue' (Davis, 2020, see also Harrison, 2012 and Whatchemacallit et al., 2018)
- double check and if necessary find a reputable source for 'common knowledge' (see above). It's very easy to think you know something and get caught out by a couple of hundred years or advancements in the field (don't, for instance, assume you know about the pecking order of hens. Biology has advanced A LOT beyond the 'common model'. [This is a real example from a book I edited recently. I now know a lot more about the complexities of the social life of hens than I did.]
- know the classics of the field and read up to the present day. A good bibliography has monographs, edited volumes, and journal articles, depending on the field there may be a sprinkling of newspapers (Guardian, NYTimes-level) or magazines like Nature. Many people read a bibliography to get an overview of the body of knowledge of a student, if it's mostly older articles there's a suspicion you didn't do current research [more than one plagiarist was caught this way], if it's mostly easily available material you give the impression of not having done any in-depth research involving a library.

- last but not least, googling for [article title].pdf and looking on google scholar often gives you access when you can't get stuff through your library online. She should have a JSTOR account anyway, but JSTOR is often awkward to read.

[davidgillon]

That strikes me as some extremely useful advice, thank you!